2GT-RichandClaude Opus 5
57d650c159
Closes #105. RouterOS narrates the whole life of an association in its log — association, every band or AP change, and the disconnect — each line carrying the signal at that moment. Nothing else in the platform can see any of it: roaming happens between polls, so a poll only ever observes where a client ended up, never that it moved. Sessions are now rebuilt from those lines and shown on the client detail page: the path across radios, signal at each step, duration, and RouterOS's own disconnect reason. Sessions averaging six or more roams an hour are flagged, since a client bouncing between radios is usually a roaming-threshold problem rather than a faulty client. No new collection and no new storage. It reads the events already gathered, so it works retroactively over whatever log history exists. Two things came out of testing against real logs rather than the samples in the issue, and both were wrong in ways the samples could not have shown: Ordering. RouterOS log timestamps are second-granular, so a reassociation emits its disconnect and reconnect inside the same logged second, and collection assigns sub-second values in whichever order they were read — observed on a live AP as both `.849/.849` and `.096/.097` for the same kind of pair. Sorting on the raw timestamp attached the disconnect to the session the connect had just opened, so every reassociation reconstructed as a 0-second session while the real one disappeared. On one IoT client that was 255 phantom sessions out of 422. Events are now ordered by whole second and ties broken by meaning: a disconnect closes what came before, a connect opens what comes after. The same client now shows its real behaviour — 900s, 840s and 930s sessions, reassociating every 15 minutes. Signal sanity. Real logs contain `signal strength 91`. dBm is negative, so a positive reading is not a measurement; recording it would draw a client with an impossibly perfect signal. Treated as unknown. 21 tests, including the full ping-pong trace quoted in the issue — which the reconstruction correctly identifies as flapping — plus both timestamp-collision shapes seen in production. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
50 lines
1.3 KiB
JSON
50 lines
1.3 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"name": "mikrotik-manager-frontend",
|
|
"version": "0.23.11-beta",
|
|
"private": true,
|
|
"type": "module",
|
|
"scripts": {
|
|
"dev": "vite",
|
|
"build": "tsc && vite build",
|
|
"preview": "vite preview",
|
|
"lint": "eslint src",
|
|
"test": "vitest run"
|
|
},
|
|
"dependencies": {
|
|
"@tanstack/react-query": "^5.101.0",
|
|
"@types/leaflet": "^1.9.21",
|
|
"@xterm/addon-fit": "^0.11.0",
|
|
"@xterm/xterm": "^6.0.0",
|
|
"@xyflow/react": "^12.11.1",
|
|
"axios": "^1.18.1",
|
|
"clsx": "^2.1.0",
|
|
"date-fns": "^3.2.0",
|
|
"leaflet": "^1.9.4",
|
|
"lucide-react": "^1.23.0",
|
|
"react": "^19.2.7",
|
|
"react-dom": "^19.2.7",
|
|
"react-router-dom": "^7.18.1",
|
|
"recharts": "^2.10.3",
|
|
"socket.io-client": "^4.7.3",
|
|
"tailwind-merge": "^3.5.0",
|
|
"zustand": "^4.4.7"
|
|
},
|
|
"devDependencies": {
|
|
"@eslint/js": "^9.39.4",
|
|
"@types/react": "^19.2.14",
|
|
"@types/react-dom": "^19.2.3",
|
|
"@vitejs/plugin-react": "^6.0.3",
|
|
"autoprefixer": "^10.4.17",
|
|
"eslint": "^9.39.4",
|
|
"eslint-plugin-react": "^7.37.5",
|
|
"eslint-plugin-react-hooks": "^7.0.1",
|
|
"eslint-plugin-security": "^4.0.0",
|
|
"postcss": "^8.5.10",
|
|
"tailwindcss": "^3.4.1",
|
|
"typescript": "^5.9.3",
|
|
"typescript-eslint": "^8.58.2",
|
|
"vite": "^8.0.16",
|
|
"vitest": "^4.1.8"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|