2GT-RichandClaude Opus 5
1a4b635052
CI / Deployment files in sync (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / Frontend — Lint, Type-check, Test & Build (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / Backend — Lint, Type-check & Build (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / Security Audit (push) Canceled after 0s
CodeQL Security Analysis / Analyze (javascript-typescript) (push) Canceled after 0s
Documentation / Build (check only) (push) Canceled after 0s
Documentation / Publish versioned site (push) Canceled after 0s
Publish to GHCR / Build & Push Backend (push) Canceled after 0s
Publish to GHCR / Build & Push Nginx (Frontend) (push) Canceled after 0s
Release / release (push) Canceled after 0s
A regression I introduced in v0.24.3, and described inaccurately in its own commit message. Adding concurrency moved the halt check to the end of a wave. I wrote that "at the default of 1 those are the same moment". That is only true of a wave holding one device. With several devices in one wave and the default sequential setting, the old code stopped the moment one failed; mine went on to attempt every remaining device in that wave first. Anyone relying on halt-on-failure with a wide wave 1 got a wider blast radius than before, without changing a setting. Halting now stops further devices from *starting* as soon as a failure is known, whatever the concurrency. Devices already in flight are allowed to finish, because interrupting one mid-write is how you brick it. At concurrency 1 that is precisely the previous behaviour. Above 1, only the devices genuinely running side by side can carry a bad build -- which is the unavoidable part of the trade in #135, rather than a cost imposed on rollouts that never asked for concurrency. The firmware documentation said the same wrong thing and is corrected. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
50 lines
1.3 KiB
JSON
50 lines
1.3 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"name": "mikrotik-manager-frontend",
|
|
"version": "0.24.5-beta",
|
|
"private": true,
|
|
"type": "module",
|
|
"scripts": {
|
|
"dev": "vite",
|
|
"build": "tsc && vite build",
|
|
"preview": "vite preview",
|
|
"lint": "eslint src",
|
|
"test": "vitest run"
|
|
},
|
|
"dependencies": {
|
|
"@tanstack/react-query": "^5.101.0",
|
|
"@types/leaflet": "^1.9.21",
|
|
"@xterm/addon-fit": "^0.11.0",
|
|
"@xterm/xterm": "^6.0.0",
|
|
"@xyflow/react": "^12.11.1",
|
|
"axios": "^1.18.1",
|
|
"clsx": "^2.1.0",
|
|
"date-fns": "^3.2.0",
|
|
"leaflet": "^1.9.4",
|
|
"lucide-react": "^1.23.0",
|
|
"react": "^19.2.7",
|
|
"react-dom": "^19.2.7",
|
|
"react-router-dom": "^7.18.1",
|
|
"recharts": "^2.10.3",
|
|
"socket.io-client": "^4.7.3",
|
|
"tailwind-merge": "^3.6.0",
|
|
"zustand": "^4.4.7"
|
|
},
|
|
"devDependencies": {
|
|
"@eslint/js": "^9.39.4",
|
|
"@types/react": "^19.2.14",
|
|
"@types/react-dom": "^19.2.3",
|
|
"@vitejs/plugin-react": "^6.0.3",
|
|
"autoprefixer": "^10.4.17",
|
|
"eslint": "^9.39.4",
|
|
"eslint-plugin-react": "^7.37.5",
|
|
"eslint-plugin-react-hooks": "^7.0.1",
|
|
"eslint-plugin-security": "^4.0.0",
|
|
"postcss": "^8.5.10",
|
|
"tailwindcss": "^3.4.1",
|
|
"typescript": "^5.9.3",
|
|
"typescript-eslint": "^8.58.2",
|
|
"vite": "^8.2.1",
|
|
"vitest": "^4.1.8"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|