Production-readiness cycle. Classifier was excessively conservative (real Run A: ACTIONABLE_NOW/UNASSIGNED_ACTIONABLE both 0) and made concrete semantic mistakes on real tickets: - #34419: technician "Rafael Brito" (internal) classified as WAITING_VENDOR waiting_for -- an internal technician is not a vendor. - #37389: ticket had concrete open tasks ("Realizar um inventário das máquinas", "Alinhar o dia...") but was classified INSUFFICIENT_CONTEXT. - Generic next_action ("Revisar chamado") repeated across unrelated tickets, proving nothing about real actionability. Rewrote the system prompt (n8n/nodes/prepare-ai-prompt.node.js) with: practical actionability definition ("suporte consegue fazer algo util agora", explicit inclusion list); contatar-vs-aguardar distinction with examples; WAITING_* requires positive evidence (action already taken AND external dependency still open); technician-vs-vendor distinction citing the TECNICO context field; STATUS Planejado alone != blocked/scheduled; SCHEDULED requires an explicit date/window; mandatory chronological interpretation (most recent apontamento wins over a superseded old blocker); next_action must be concrete, with explicit accepted/rejected examples; INSUFFICIENT_CONTEXT bar raised (ask "is there a diagnostic step available even without full info" first). n8n/nodes/prepare-ai-prompt.node.test.js: 10 new tests asserting each rule's text is still present in the prompt (deterministic proxy -- behavioral proof comes from the real DEV run, inspected manually). logic/classification.js: added AI_CLASSIFIER_VERSION=3 (stamped on every valid classification); added a deterministic safety net (not just a prompt hope) -- isWaitingForInternalTechnician() rejects WAITING_VENDOR when waiting_for matches the ticket's own TECNICO field, routing to a new fallback_reason 'ai_semantic_conflict' instead of accepting a known-wrong semantic classification; added next_action genericness rejection (isGenericNextAction) for ACTIONABLE_NOW/UNASSIGNED_ACTIONABLE only. n8n/nodes/validate-ai-response.node.js: now passes the ticket into validateAiClassification() so the technician guard has the facts it needs. logic/cache.js: added buildCacheKey(contextHash, classifierVersion) -> "<hash>:v<version>", stored in the same last_context_hash column (no schema migration) -- bumping AI_CLASSIFIER_VERSION now forces a cache miss on every ticket without manually clearing the Data Table. n8n/nodes/decide-needs-ai.node.js / prepare-memoria-analise-record.node.js updated to compute/persist the composite key. logic/config.js: AI_MAX_CANDIDATES default raised 30->60 (now equals CANDIDATE_POOL_SIZE) -- no candidate should go unanalyzed by an artificial cap now that Run B already proved the cache makes repeat runs cheap; AI_FALLBACK stays reserved for real provider failures. Also added SEND_ENABLED (default false) and ENVIRONMENT config fields for the real Slack send gate (used by logic/slack.js, next commit). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
35 lines
1.3 KiB
JavaScript
35 lines
1.3 KiB
JavaScript
// @requires classification.js fallback.js
|
|
const promptItems = $('Code - Preparar Prompt IA').all();
|
|
const responseItems = $input.all();
|
|
|
|
return responseItems.map((responseItem, index) => {
|
|
const original = (promptItems[index] && promptItems[index].json) || {};
|
|
const httpJson = responseItem.json || {};
|
|
|
|
if (httpJson.error) {
|
|
return { json: { ...original, aiClassification: buildFallbackClassification('ai_error') } };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let raw = null;
|
|
try {
|
|
const content = httpJson.choices && httpJson.choices[0] && httpJson.choices[0].message && httpJson.choices[0].message.content;
|
|
raw = content ? JSON.parse(content) : null;
|
|
} catch (e) {
|
|
raw = null;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Passa o ticket pra validacao poder aplicar a guarda deterministica "tecnico interno nunca
|
|
// vira WAITING_VENDOR" (logic/classification.js -> isWaitingForInternalTechnician). Sem
|
|
// isso a validacao so olha o JSON cru, nunca os fatos do proprio chamado.
|
|
const validation = validateAiClassification(raw, original.ticket);
|
|
let aiClassification;
|
|
if (validation.valid) {
|
|
aiClassification = validation.data;
|
|
} else {
|
|
const isSemanticConflict = validation.errors.some((e) => e.includes('tecnico interno'));
|
|
aiClassification = buildFallbackClassification(isSemanticConflict ? 'ai_semantic_conflict' : 'invalid_json');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return { json: { ...original, aiClassification } };
|
|
});
|