fix(v2): WAITING_*/blocked classes never enter Top10 regardless of contextChanged
Real bug confirmed in the prior cycle's Run A: WAITING_VENDOR tickets
entered the Top10 solely because contextChanged=true (a fresh AI call
happened this run) -- contextChanged should only decide whether to
reanalyze (logic/cache.js), never whether an already-still-blocked
ticket can compete.
logic/cooldown.js: removed the `&& !contextChanged` condition from the
BLOCKING_CLASSIFICATIONS check in computeCooldown -- a ticket whose
CURRENT classification (fresh or cached) is in BLOCKING_CLASSIFICATIONS
is now excluded unconditionally. Also expanded BLOCKING_CLASSIFICATIONS
to the full list required this cycle: WAITING_REQUESTER, WAITING_VENDOR,
WAITING_APPROVAL, SCHEDULED, DEPENDENCY_BLOCKED, PROJECT_LONG_TERM,
DUPLICATE_OR_OBSOLETE (WAITING_APPROVAL/PROJECT_LONG_TERM/
DUPLICATE_OR_OBSOLETE previously only had a score penalty, not exclusion
-- WAITING_APPROVAL has positive base score points, so it could
genuinely win a Top10 slot before this fix). The critical-override escape
hatch (SLA vencido + prioridade alta, etc.) is untouched -- still the
only way a blocked classification can surface.
logic/cooldown.test.js: rewrote the one test that was actually asserting
the buggy behavior ("mudanca de contexto real desbloqueia mesmo em
estado de espera" -> now proves the opposite, with a comment explaining
why); added tests for the chronology-driven unblock case (ticket moves
out of a blocking classification entirely) and the two newly-blocking
classes.
logic/score.test.js: added end-to-end tests through computeScore()
proving WAITING_VENDOR and WAITING_APPROVAL are excludedFromTop10 even
with contextChanged=true.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Sonnet 5
parent
482b7ef48e
commit
e0f4b9a5d0
@@ -89,3 +89,14 @@ test('INSUFFICIENT_CONTEXT critico entra somente pela excecao definida', () => {
|
||||
assert.equal(result.excludedFromTop10, false);
|
||||
assert.equal(result.decisionReason, 'insufficient_context_critical_override');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('BUG REAL comprovado na Run A anterior: WAITING_VENDOR fica fora do Top10 mesmo com contextChanged=true -- missao "finalizacao para producao" secao 10', () => {
|
||||
const result = computeScore({ ticket: ticket({}), aiClassification: ai({ classification: 'WAITING_VENDOR', actionable_today: false, confidence: 0.8 }), memory: null, contextChanged: true, config: CONFIG, now: NOW });
|
||||
assert.equal(result.excludedFromTop10, true);
|
||||
assert.equal(result.exclusionReason, 'blocked_waiting_vendor');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('WAITING_APPROVAL (pontuacao base positiva) tambem fica fora do Top10 -- antes so tinha penalidade de score, nao exclusao', () => {
|
||||
const result = computeScore({ ticket: ticket({}), aiClassification: ai({ classification: 'WAITING_APPROVAL', actionable_today: false, confidence: 0.8 }), memory: null, contextChanged: true, config: CONFIG, now: NOW });
|
||||
assert.equal(result.excludedFromTop10, true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user